Cookies   I display ads to cover the expenses. See the privacy policy for more information. You can keep or reject the ads.

# Stokes' theorem intuition | Multivariable Calculus | Khan Academy

So I've drawn multiple versions of the exact same surface
S, five copies of that exact same surface.
And what I want to do is think about the value of the line
integral-- let me write this down-- the value of the line
integral of F dot dr, where F is the vector field that I've
drawn in magenta in each of these diagrams.
And obviously, it's different in each of these diagrams.
And the only part of the vector field that I've drawn
is a part that's along the surface.
I could have drawn the part of the vector field
that's off the surface, but we're only
going to be concerned with what's going on on the surface.
So the vector field could be defined
in this entire three-dimensional space in here as well.
And these are obviously different vector fields,
and we can see that visually based on how we drew it.
And the contour that we care about-- remember,
we're going to take a line integral, so the path matters.
The path that we care about is the counterclockwise boundary
of our surface, so it's going to be this right over here.
The counterclockwise boundary of our surface
is what we're going to be taking F dot dr along.
So this right over here, and let me draw the orientation.
It's going to be counterclockwise.
And we're going to do it in every one of these situations,
for every one of these surfaces and every one of these F's.
And what I really want to think about is how the value of F
dot dr over that contour, how it might
change from example to example.
And obviously, the only difference
between each of these is what the vector field F is doing.
So first let's think about this example right over here.
At this part of the contour, this bottom part
right over here, our vector field
is going in the exact same direction as our line,
as our contour.
So we're going to get positive values of F dot dr down here,
and we're going to keep summing them up.
We're taking an integral.
Then as we go up the curve or as we
go kind of uphill right over here,
we see that our vector field is going essentially orthogonal.
It's going perpendicular.
It's going perpendicular to our contour.
So our F dot dr, we're not going to get any value from that.
F dot dr and all of these, this part of the contour,
it's all going to be 0.
So we're not going to get anything right over there.
Actually, let me just write nothing.
So we get nothing right over there.
Maybe I'll write 0.
I'll write we'll get 0 right over there.
And then up here, when we're at this part of the contour,
our vector field is going in the exact opposite direction
as our path.
Up here our path is going, I guess,
from the right to the left, while our vector field
is going from the left to the right.
And so we're actually going to get negative values.
We are going to get negative values up here,
and they're going to sum up to a reasonable negative value.
And if the vector field is constant,
and I kind of drew it like it is,
and if this length is equal to this length,
then these two values are going to cancel out.
When you add this positive sum to this negative sum,
they're going to be 0.
And then once again, when you go downhill again,
the vector field is perpendicular
to our actual path, so we're going to get 0.
So based on the way I've described it,
your line integral of F dot dr for this version of F
in this example right over here, it might all cancel out.
You will get something, if we make the assumptions that I
made, this might be equal to 0.
So in this example, F dot dr could be equal to 0.
Now let's think about what's going on in this situation.
In this one, just like the last one, as we go along the bottom,
the vector field is going in the exact same direction
as our contour, so we're going to get positive values.
And once we go up the hill, the vector field
is going perpendicular to our path,
so it's not going to add anything really to it.
So we're just going to get 0 along this part.
But then up here, our vector field has switched directions.
And once again, it's going in the exact same direction
as our path, so we're going to get more positive values right
over there.
And then as we go down here, it's
not going to add anything because our vector field is
perpendicular to our path.
So we're going to get 0.
But notice, now these two ends don't cancel out
with each other.
We're going to get a positive value.
We are going to get a positive value.
And what was the difference between this version
of F, this vector field, and this vector field
right over here?
Well, this vector field switched directions
so that the top part didn't cancel out
with the bottom part.
Or another way to think about it is, it had some curl.
There's a little bit of spinning going on.
If this was describing the velocity of a fluid,
and if you were to put a stick right over there
on the surface, the stick would spin.
It has some spin or some curl, however
you want to describe it.
This right over here has no curl.
If you put a stick right over here,
it would just flow with the fluid,
but the stick itself would not spin.
So we got a positive value for the line integral
in this situation.
And we also have, it looks like, a positive curl.
Now let's think about this one.
In this situation, as we go along this part of our contour,
our vector field F is going in the exact same direction,
so we're going to get positive values.
Now as we go uphill, our vector field F,
it's also kind of turned in that direction,
and so we'll get more positive values.
And now as we go in that direction,
our vector field F is still going
in the direction of our contour, we're
going to get more positive values.
And as we go down, once again the vector field F
is going in the direction of our contour,
so we'll get even more positive values.
So in this situation, the value of our line integral of F
dot dr is even more positive.
And we see that the actual vector field along
the surface-- and remember, the vector field
might be doing all sorts of crazy things off the surface.
Actually, let me draw that in that same magenta color.
It might be doing all sorts of crazy things off the surface,
but what we really care about is what's
happening on the surface.
And because this vector field is,
I guess you could say curling, or it's
spinning along the surface, it allows
it to go with the boundary along all the points,
and we get a very positive value for this line integral.
So we have a higher curl.
So more curl, it looks like, is leading to a more positive line
integral.
Now let's think about what's happening
in this situation right over here.
This situation down here, our vector field
is going in the same direction as our path,
so we're going to get positive values.
Just like the first situation, as we go up the hill like this
or up the surface like that, our vector field
is perpendicular to our surface, so it's really not
going to add anything to our line integral.
And then as we go along this top part, this first part
of the top part right over here, the vector field
is going against us.
So it's negative right over here.
We're going in the exact opposite direction of our path.
And then, right as we get to the end,
the vector field flips direction,
and we get a little bit of positive right
over here because it's a little bit of it
going in the same direction.
And then we go back downhill.
When we go back downhill, it adds nothing
because our vector field is going perpendicular
to our path.
So the big difference between this case and the case
up here is the case up here-- well,
actually, I could compare between these two or these two.
But the difference between this one and this one
is that at least this part of the vector field
has switched directions.
So we get a little bit of positive value.
And one way to think about it, this one
is going to be less positive than that, if we take the line
integral, but more positive than that.
And one other way to think about it
is, we have a little bit of curl going on right over here.
Our vector field switched directions right around there,
or I guess you could say that it's
spinning right around there.
So if you put a stick, if that was in the water,
it would start spinning.
But everywhere else, there isn't a lot of curl.
So you have some curl, but it's over a little small region
of the surface.
While over here, you had curl going on
over a larger portion of our surface.
And so up here, you had a more positive curl,
more positive line integral.
Here you have a curl over less of the surface,
and you're going to have a less positive line integral.
Now let's think about this one over here.
This vector field, along the surface there is some curl.
There's some curl going on right over there.
If you put a stick in the water, if you
view that as the velocity of water, the stick would spin.
So you have some curl.
But then it switches direction again,
so you have curl there as well, and it's actually
curl in the opposite direction.
So to some degree, if you were to sum all of this up,
maybe it would cancel out.
And it makes sense.
It makes sense that it would cancel out
because when you take the line integral
around the whole thing, just like this first situation,
it looks like it will add up to 0.
Because even though you have some curl,
the curls cancel out each other.
And so when you go to this top part of the surface,
the vector field is going in the exact same direction
as this bottom part of the surface.
So if you were to take your line integral, the same one that we
care about, just like the first situation
it would be positive down here, 0 as we go up the curve.
And then as we go down here, the vector field
has switched directions twice, so it's still
going against the path of our contour,
just like this first situation.
So it would be negative up there.
And then as we go down, it would be 0.
So this thing right over here also
looks just like the first one because the curls essentially
cancel out.
We switched direction twice.
So over here, our line integral might also be 0.
Now, the whole reason why I went through this exercise
is to give you an intuition of why it might make sense
that if we have more curl happening over
more of this surface, why that might make
the value of this line integral be larger.
And so, hopefully, it starts to give you
an intuition that maybe, just maybe, the value of this line
integral, the value of F dot dr over that contour,
over this contour that's going in the counterclockwise
direction-- we'll talk more about orientation
in future videos-- maybe this is equal to the sum
of the curls over the surface.
And so let's think about this.
It could be a surface integral.
So we're going to go over the surface,
and what we care about is the curl of F.
We care about the curl of F. But we don't just
care about the curl of F generally because F might
be spinning in a direction, in a way, that's off the surface.
We care about how much it's curling on the surface.
So what we would want to do is we'd want to take the curl of F
and dot it with the normal vector at any point
to the surface and then multiply that times the surface itself.
And this is just to say that the more surface where
we have more curling going on, the more
that the line integral, the value of the line integral,
might be.
And we saw that when we compared these three examples.
And another way of writing all of this
is the surface integral-- let me write
the surface in that same brown color--
the surface integral of the curl of F, which would just
be another vector that tells us how much we are spinning
generally, but we want to care how much we're
spinning along the surface.
So we're dotting it with the normal vector.
Or another way to write this whole thing is to say dot ds.
So if you take essentially the sum across the entire surface
of how much we're curling, how much we're
spinning along that surface, then maybe, just maybe,
this will be equal to the value of the line integral
as we go around the boundary of the surface.
And it actually turns out that this is the case.
And obviously, I haven't proven it to you here,
but hopefully you have some intuition why this makes sense.
And this idea that this is equal to this
is called Stokes' theorem, and we'll
explore it more in the next few videos.